Those who belong to or have lived in Haryana, Delhi or Northwestern UP, understand what “Khari boli” (Haryanavi) dialect of Hindi is all about. Some people say it lacks sophistication and even that it’s rude.
The perception of lack of sophistication or being “rude”, is probably because that the words which show respect in Hindi are not part of khari boli, for example , to address someone, “Aap” is non existant, mainly “Tu” is used, and if one wants to give lot of respect “Tum” is used :) .Also, “iye” of sophisticated Hindi is not spoken in “Khari Boli” for example, to ask some one to sit “ Bathiye” wont be used , only “baith ja” or “Baitho” shall be used. Also, the sentence closing “Hai” of mainstream Hindi is not used in “Khari boli” .The terms most distinct about khari boi are use of “Maka” and “ Nuko” for “Maine kaha” (I said) and “usne kaha” (he/she said).. Hindi words are spoken differently to give a unique flow to the language, like the word “Anghuthi” (Ring) will be pronounced as “Gunthi”.“Khari Boli” when spoken in it’s original form, is an unbelievably fast accent ..and difference between normal sophisticated Hindi and Khari Boli is just like the difference of spoken English between Indians and westerners.
But, of late “Khari Boli” accent is on decline. First of all Delhi lost it, being a major metropolis and capital of the country, and nowadays urban regions of Haryana and northwestern UP are loosing it and is limited to older generations only, and young generation have developed more sophisticated form of Hindi. The reason behind is the general perception even in the native speakers, that “Khari boi” is “rude” way of speaking and is not sophisticated. Nowadays it has become unfashionable to speak it.
There have been efforts to sanskritize Khari Boli, but this dilect of Hindi will die if sanskritised, as Sanskrit words doesn’t fit naturally here. Of Course the standard or pure Hindi derives it’s vocabulary from Sanskrit, but Khari Boli is different, and uses basically “Tadhbhav” form of Sanskrit words.
But I believe Khari boli is very much alive in the rural area of this region, and some of my relatives (Younger generation too) who live in the villages/small towns of this region, speak it. I personally am very fond of Khari Boli… since my childhood I’ve scene my relatives speaking it, though myself and our parents don’t speak it having lived in urban areas, but my parents can switch gear anytime and start speaking it when with our relatives :) , but myself and my brother (Like other younger generation of urban population of this region ) are not able to speak it, but still we love it.
P.S.- In Bollywood, Khari boli is very rare…A recent example i’ve scene in Bollywood is the character of Komal Chautala in the film “Chak de India”, who spoke in Khari boli dilect

September 24, 2008 at 3:49 pm
Vivek, I guess we should communicate in ‘Khari boli’. I don’t want to sound pompous but I am really good at it. There are a few TV programmes on SAB TV in which they use authentic Khari boli. I differ with you //is limited to older generations only//. In the rural ares people still communicate in this form of Hindi. I can speak khari boli. The medal winners from Bhiwani were all speaking Khari boli, although they were trying hard not to.
September 24, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Prerna, yes i’ve mentioned in the post itself that in rural areas it’s still spoken including younger generation
But i dont understand why there is a widespread perception that it’s rude ..i dont think it’s rude at all..i love it
September 25, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Vivek
I grew up in MP and UP. Like Prerna, I speak very good Hindi and can converse without sprinkling any English or other language into it.
I do find the use of ‘tu’ and ‘tum’ a bit too familiar for my liking. So I prefer the use of ‘aap’ for strangers, elders as well as young children even if I think people using ‘tu’ for God and for their mothers to express closeness is fine.
What you call decline may result more from people not knowing a wide enough vocabulary which suffices for them to express themselves, than any perception of rudeness. I find it harder by the day to find youngsters in cities able to speak good Hindi. It is best if I do not start talking about what I think of their ‘Angrezi’ or whatever they think they are speaking.
September 25, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Shefaly
I was not talking about General Hindi, but a specific dialect “Khari boli”
And as i said , the younger generation in the urban areas of the region i mentioned has started avoiding speaking this dialect and try to speak mainstream Hindi….
As Prerna Mentioned, the medal winners from Bhivani were trying hard not to speak “Khari boli” accent but were trying to speak more straight/mainstream Hindi…..That’s what my post is all about
Thanks for your response
September 26, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Khari boli is pretty cool, even sexy. But to someone not familiar with it, it does sound crude. Not just crude, even offensive. It takes a while to get the idea that the guy talking you is not trying to get funny!
It is not only khari boli which is dying out. Thanks to the pervasive TV culture, dialects in many languages will die out in the coming decades.
September 26, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Correction. That should have read: “to someone NOT familiar with it.”
September 26, 2008 at 1:03 pm
I have corrected your comment Mr Sharma…and yes, the mainstream dialect/accent of Hindi is causing the decline of other dialects of the language
September 26, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Vivek:
Khari Boli is not the Haryanvi dialect. Bhartendu Harishchandra wrote in Khari Boli. Some consider Kabir’s writing to be Khari Boli too. Harivansh Rai Bachchan’s “Madhushala” is in Khari Boli. Premchand wrote in Khari Boli. Khari Boli is what we speak in Uttar Pradesh and those parts of MP that are not Bundelkhand where the dialect is very different. Khari Boli is definitely not the Haryanvi dialect. Prior to efforts to ‘tatsam-ise’ Hindi, so to speak, Khari Boli had considerable Arabic and Persian influence.
A Haryanvi friend of mine, who is from Mewat, confirms that the term for the Haryanvi dialect is not Khari Boli but Sansi Boli. Haryanvi dialects have very little similarity with Khari Boli actually.
I suppose we are disagreeing on your terminology.
September 26, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Vivek:
I read your post again but I was not sure if you are objecting to the tatsam-isation/ Sanskritisation? Khari Boli was always a khichdi and now the khichdi is getting different kinds of masalas. I am just curious why you think this is something that will lead to Khari Boli’s decline?
September 26, 2008 at 3:55 pm
Shefaly
Yes I know, that the term “Khari boli” , has got some confusion..and i dont know the reason behind this confusion..some say it’s normal day to day “Khichdi” kind of Hindi which is spoken in central UP and MP and also in bollywood…
But if you come to Northwestern UP or Haryana..they call their language too “Khari boli” and also “Haryanavi”…and i firmly believe “Khari boli” and “Haryanavi” are same and it’s clear from the very first line of my post
But if you believe “Khari boli” is different from “Haryanavi”….then you can take that this post is about “Haryanavi” and not “khari boli”
Whether you go to Haryana or Western UP,in both the places exactly the same language is spoken , call it “Haryanavi” or call it “Khari boli”
..which is very much different from Kabir, or Harivansh Rai bachchan or Premchand…
I think the confusion is only about the term “Khari boli” and not about the language which is spoken in the particular region
The issue of my post was that people who are native speakers of this dialect of Hindi (Khari boli/Haryanavi)…are giving it up and adopting more mainstream Hindi..and it’s very rare to see younger generation speaking in this dialect..but it’s still alive in rural areas
Shefaly i dont know whether you have heard someone speaking this dialect or not…
Regarding your next comment
As i said, my post is only about the Hindi dialect which is spoken in Haryana, Delhi and adjoining UP areas..you call it “Haryanavi” or “Khari boli” , doesn’t matter…..and about sanskritisation, i meant that the “Tatsam” sanskrit words doesn’t fit in the flow of “Khari boli” (or call it “Haryanavi”)
btw i’m also a big fan of the other sophisticated kind of Hindi, which is very much sanskritized and has become standard Hindi..what they call “Shuddh Hindi”..and i’m good at it
October 1, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Very Interesting Vivek.
I was not aware of “Khari Boli” and its distinctness from “Shudh Hindi”. In Mumbai, we speak what is known as “Bambaiya Hindi”.
We see similar differences in all state languages. You have wide differences between the Marathi spoken in Konkan and the Marathi spoken in Khandesh, Marathwada, Western Maharashtra and Vidarbha. Marathi TV tends to be the shudh Marathi type with neutral accents (reflecting Pune / Mumbai accents).
I am sure similar changes are happening everywhere. We also have a new animal in hybrid language with English mixed with each state language.
Great Post.
October 3, 2008 at 8:52 am
Thanks Mavin
I understand Marathi is a very rich language
The variations in the dialects of Indian languages are the uniqueness of them
November 16, 2008 at 4:41 pm
khari boli is not spoken in mp but it is a language of haryana and its adjacent districts of up………..
u really can’t use this language in cities as it sounds
really very bad…khari boli is very often associated with jats.
people speaking this lang looks like illetrate.
so nobody can save it..mera to yo vichar hai thara kya kahna ha.
April 24, 2009 at 1:00 pm
dear sir
pls boli fonds
June 16, 2009 at 5:45 am
I don’t quite understand that…
The sources I had read always say that Standard Hindi and Standard Urdu are based on Khari Boli dialect of Delhi. So what did the late-Mughal aristocrats speak in Delhi? Do they address “Tu” to each other in their zaban-e-urdu-e-mualla? If so, that would be really strange to me. And if not, how is it that, that people in Delhi cease to speak Khari-boli now?
July 31, 2009 at 4:12 pm
Shefaly,
(WRT your comments of September 26, 2008)
//Khari Boli is what we speak in [Uttar Pradesh and] those parts of MP that are not Bundelkhand …//
Does this mean that the dialects of MP such as Malvi, Nimadi, Bagheli, besides its tribal languages such as Bhilodi, Gondi, Korku and Kalto (Nahali), are all lumped together under “Khari Boli”, whereas Bundeli has an independent identity?